Bayer Plans Sell-Off that would Worsen Competition in Seeds, Chemicals

 
Seeds.jpg

In the fall of 2016, the German drug, seed, and crop chemicals conglomerate Bayer announced plans to merge with the U.S. chemical and bio-tech seed giant Monsanto. Hoping to overcome objections from European anti-trust regulators, Bayer is promising to sell off its vegetable seed business to BASF, a German corporation that is currently the largest chemical maker in the world.

But would such a three-way deal actually reduce the monopoly problem in food and agriculture? Actually, it would do the reverse.

For one, it would turn BASF into a massive, integrated seed and chemical company. Currently, BASF produces agricultural chemicals but is not in the seed business itself. Instead, it partners with independent seed companies to produce pesticides and herbicides optimized to work with the specific strains of seeds the independents offer. This allows smaller seed companies to compete against big integrated firms like Dow, Bayer, and Monsanto that produce both seeds and chemicals.

But if BASF gets into the seed business itself it will be competing with, rather than servicing the independent seed companies it currently supplies with chemicals. Independent seed companies would lose a neutral chemical company to work with, making it that much more difficult for smaller, newer companies to compete with the biggest agro-giants.

“You will now have to make entry at the seed and chemical level, to be a competitor,” says Peter Carstensen, a law professor at the University of Wisconsin, “which will make it substantially more burdensome, if not possible, for anyone to emerge as a competitor to constrain the market power” of the biggest agriculture companies.

If antitrust enforcers approve the deal, BASF is likely to act like other big, integrated agribusinesses. These companies "leverage their market power to drive purchases of a narrower set of products,” says Kristina Hubbard, advocacy and communications director at the Organic Seed Alliance. Just as Monsanto uses its vast control over seeds and seed traits to steer farmers toward buying Monsanto herbicides and pesticides, BASF would have every reason to do the same.

In other words, Bayer’s planned sell-off would turn BASF into a more dominant company in the seed and agrochemicals sector without reducing concentration in this highly concentrated industry. Indeed, Bayer would grow even more powerful and dominant via its merger with Monsanto, which already controls 98% of seed traits for herbicide resistant soybeans, and 79% of seed traits for herbicide resistant corn.

"We think the merger is too big to fix,” says Diana Moss, president of the American Antitrust Institute. "The only effective remedy here is for the government to move to block the merger.”

Patrick Woodall, research director and senior policy advocate at Food and Water Watch, agrees. Rather than divesting bits and pieces of Monsanto or Bayer, "it makes more sense to block the merger.”

Antitrust enforcers in the US and Europe continue to scrutinize Bayer’s proposed takeover of Monsanto, and the process is taking longer than expected, according to Bayer. Originally, the company predicted the deal would close by the beginning of 2018, but this week, Bayer chief executive Werner Baumann said the company plans to close the deal in the second quarter of 2018.

What We're Reading

  • A U.S. district judge blocked a California requirement that Monsanto place warning labels on its popular herbicide Roundup, saying there is not enough evidence to determine whether the product's active ingredient causes cancer. The labeling requirement, set to go into effect in July, is based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer's 2015 conclusion that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, causes cancer. Nonetheless, the judge did allow California to continue listing glyphosate as a substance that causes cancer in the state's health and safety codes.

  • Amazon is planning to add its own private label products to Whole Food shelves, as well as other name-brand products like Coca-Cola. The addition of private label products could come as soon as March, but the plan to add other consumer packaged goods is drawing opposition from people at Whole Foods. The addition of such products is part of a larger suite of changes – including changes to the store's marketing and new stocking procedures – that the e-commerce company is applying to Whole Foods, which it acquired last year.

  • Restaurant delivery company Doordash recently closed a funding round valuing it at $1.4 billion, making it the first food delivery company to reach such a high valuation. The company reported that it is now working with nearly 90% of the top restaurants in the U.S. and is planning to expand from 600 to 1600 cities.